Commercial Quantum Computer?

Quantum computers could revolutionize the way we tackle problems that stump even the best classical computers.
Single atom transistor recently introduced has been seen as a tool that could lead the way to building a quantum computer. For general introduction how quantum computer work, read A tale of two qubits: how quantum computers work article.

D-Wave Announces Commercially Available Quantum Computer article tells that computing company D-Wave has announced that they’re selling a quantum computing system commercially, which they’re calling the D-Wave One. D-Wave system comes equipped with a 128-qubit processor that’s designed to perform discrete optimization operations. The processor uses quantum annealing to perform these operations.

D-Wave is advertisting a number of different applications for its quantum computing system, primarily in the field of artificial intelligence. According to the company, its system can handle virtually any AI application that can be translated to a Markov random field.

dwave

Learning to program the D-Wave One blog article tells that the processor in the D-Wave One – codenamed Rainier – is designed to perform a single mathematical operation called discrete optimization. It is a special purpose processor. When writing applications the D-Wave One is used only for the steps in your task that involve solving optimization problems. All the other parts of your code still run on your conventional systems of choice. Rainier solves optimization problems using quantum annealing (QA), which is a class of problem solving approaches that use quantum effects to help get better solutions, faster. Learning to program the D-Wave One is the first in a series of blog posts describing the algorithms we have run on D-Wave quantum computers, and how to use these to build interesting applications.

But is this the start of the quantum computers era? Maybe not. D-Wave Announces Commercially Available Quantum Computer article comments tell a story that this computer might not be the quantum computer you might be waiting for. It seem that the name “quantum computer” is a bit misleading for this product. There are serious controversies around the working and “quantumness” of the machine. D-Wave has been heavily criticized by some scientists in the quantum computing field. First sale for quantum computing article tells that uncertainty persists around how the impressive black monolith known as D-Wave One actually works. Computer scientists have long questioned whether D-Wave’s systems truly exploit quantum physics on their products.

Slashdot article D-Wave Announces Commercially Available Quantum Computer comments tell that this has the same central problem as before. D-Wave’s computers haven’t demonstrated that their commercial bits are entangled. There’s no way to really distinguish what they are doing from essentially classical simulated annealing. Recommended reading that is skeptical of D-Wave’s claims is much of what Scott Aaronson has wrote about them. See for example http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=639, http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=198 although interestingly after he visited D-Wave’s labs in person his views changed slightly and became slightly more sympathetic to them http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=954.

So it is hard to say if the “128 qubits” part is snake oil or for real. If the 128 “qubits” aren’t entangled at all, which means it is useless for any of the quantum algorithms that one generally thinks of. It seem that this device simply has 128 separate “qubits” that are queried individually, and is, essentially an augmented classical computer that gains a few minor advantages in some very specific algorithms (i.e. the quantum annealing algorithm) due to this qubit querying, but is otherwise indistinguishable from a really expensive classical computer for any other purpose. This has the same central problem as before: D-Wave’s computers haven’t demonstrated that their commercial bits are entangled.

Rather than constantly adding more qubits and issuing more hard-to-evaluate announcements, while leaving the scientific characterization of its devices in a state of limbo, why doesn’t D-Wave just focus all its efforts on demonstrating entanglement, or otherwise getting stronger evidence for a quantum role in the apparent speedup? There’s a reason why academic quantum computing groups focus on pushing down decoherence and demonstrating entanglement in 2, 3, or 4 qubits: because that way, at least you know that the qubits are qubits! Suppose D-Wave were marketing a classical, special-purpose, $10-million computer designed to perform simulated annealing, for 90-bit Ising spin glass problems with a certain fixed topology, somewhat better than an off-the-shelf computing cluster. Would there be even 5% of the public interest that there is now?

1,130 Comments

  1. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Quantum Circuit Uses Just A Few Atoms
    https://hackaday.com/2022/06/25/quantum-circuit-uses-just-a-few-atoms/

    Researchers at the University of New South Wales and a startup company, Silicon Quantum Computing, published results of their quantum dot experiments. The circuits use up to 10 carbon-based quantum dots on a silicon substrate. Metal gates control the flow of electrons. The paper appears in Nature and you can download the full paper from there.

    What’s new about this is that the dots are precisely arranged to simulate an organic compound, polyacetylene. This allowed researchers to model the actual molecule. Simulating molecules is important in the study of exotic matter phases, such as superconductivity. The interaction of particles inside, for example, a crystalline structure is difficult to simulate using conventional methods. By building a model using quantum techniques on the same scale and with the same topology as the molecule in question, simulation is simplified.

    Engineering topological states in atom-based semiconductor quantum dots
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04706-0

    Reply
  2. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Quantum computer cools itself down by performing calculations
    As they warm up, quantum computers can slow down or stop working altogether. A new kind made with specially engineered diamonds cools as it calculates
    https://www.newscientist.com/article/2326916-quantum-computer-cools-itself-down-by-performing-calculations/

    Reply
  3. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Quantum Computing for Dummies New guide helps beginners run quantum algorithms on IBM’s quantum computers over the cloud
    https://spectrum.ieee.org/quantum-computing-for-dummies?share_id=7120649

    Reply
  4. Tomi Engdahl says:

    QUANTUM ERROR CORRECTION: TIME TO MAKE IT WORK
    If technologists can’t perfect it, quantum computers will never be big
    https://spectrum.ieee.org/quantum-error-correction?share_id=7101013

    Reply
  5. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Scientists Finally Create A Quantum Circuit At An Atomic Scale
    An integrated circuit at this scale could pave the way for commercial quantum computers.
    https://www.iflscience.com/scientists-finally-create-a-quantum-circuit-at-an-atomic-scale-64202

    Reply
  6. Tomi Engdahl says:

    D-Wave’s 500-Qubit Machine Hits the Cloud Experimental prototype offers sneak peek of 7,000-qubit quantum computer
    https://spectrum.ieee.org/d-wave-quantum-computer?share_id=7129999

    When quantum computing pioneer D-Wave releases its next-generation Advantage2 system in 2023 or 2024, the company expects their 7,000-qubit machine to be the most powerful quantum computer of its kind in the world. Now D-Wave is making an experimental prototype of Advantage2 immediately available for use over the cloud.

    Reply
  7. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Quantum Advantage Showdowns Have No Clear Winners
    A series of recent experiments between quantum and classical computers shows the term’s ever-evolving meaning.
    https://www.wired.com/story/quantum-advantage-showdowns-have-no-clear-winners/

    Reply
  8. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Researchers achieve record entanglement of quantum memories
    https://phys.org/news/2022-07-entanglement-quantum-memories.html

    Reply
  9. Tomi Engdahl says:

    World’s first quantum computer integrated circuit
    https://www.futuretimeline.net/blog/2022/07/3-worlds-first-quantum-computer-integrated-circuit.htm

    The world’s first quantum computer integrated circuit has been demonstrated at the University of New South Wales (UNSW), Australia.

    Reply
  10. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Physicists Find The ‘Missing Link’ That Could Provide Quantum Internet Technology
    https://www.sciencealert.com/physicists-find-the-missing-link-that-could-provide-quantum-internet-technology

    Before quantum computers and quantum networks can fulfil their huge potential, scientists have got several difficult problems to overcome – but a new study outlines a potential solution to one of these problems.

    Reply
  11. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Researchers at Simon Fraser University have detected single spins optically in qubits in silicon for the first time, suggesting it may be possible to use light to “have qubits entangling with each other across a chip, or across a data center as easily as if they’re side-by-side.”

    150,000 Qubits Printed on a Chip New silicon spin qubits also emit telecom-band light
    https://spectrum.ieee.org/silicon-spin-qubits?utm_campaign=RebelMouse&socialux=facebook&share_id=7139305&utm_medium=social&utm_content=IEEE+Spectrum&utm_source=facebook

    Quantum computers can theoretically solve problems no classical computer ever could even given billions of years, but only if they possess many components known as qubits. Now scientists have fabricated more than 150,000 silicon-based qubits on a chip that they may be able to link together with light, to help form powerful quantum computers connected by a quantum Internet.

    Reply
  12. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Poliittisesti tärkeä tehdas
    Kiinan ja Yhdysvaltojen taistellessa kvanttitietokoneiden herruudesta, espoolaisen kerrostalon kellarissa humiseva konesali on Euroopan teknologiastrategian ytimessä. HS Visio vieraili 128 miljoonan euron jättirahoituksen keränneen teknologiayhtiön tehtaassa, jonne ulkopuolisilla ei tavallisesti ole mitään asiaa.
    https://www.hs.fi/visio/art-2000008945213.html

    Reply
  13. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Scientists create quantum computer that breaks free of binary system
    https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/quantum-computer-binary-qudit-science-b2128385.html#Echobox=1658416073

    Scientists have made a quantum computer that breaks free from the binary system.

    Computers as we know them today rely on binary information: they operate in ones and zeroes, storing more complex information in “bits” that either off or on. That seemingly simple system is at the heart of every computer we use.

    Quantum computers have taken on that same system. They use qubits, which replicate the bits of a classical computer but using quantum technology.

    But they are built with more than just those ones and zeroes. Quantum computers are not necessarily restricted to binary, and scientists hope that breaking them are from that system can add extra complexity without using more quantum particles.

    Now scientists say they have succeeded in building a quantum computer that works in that way. It can do calculations not with qubits but instead with qudits – quantum digits that could allow for vastly more computing power.

    Reply
  14. Tomi Engdahl says:

    New Phase of Matter Opens Portal to Extra Time Dimension
    Physicists have devised a mind-bending error-correction technique that could dramatically boost the performance of quantum computers
    https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/new-phase-of-matter-opens-portal-to-extra-time-dimension/

    Reply
  15. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Team scripts breakthrough quantum algorithm
    https://phys.org/news/2022-07-team-scripts-breakthrough-quantum-algorithm.html

    City College of New York physicist Pouyan Ghaemi and his research team are claiming significant progress in using quantum computers to study and predict how the state of a large number of interacting quantum particles evolves over time. This was done by developing a quantum algorithm that they run on an IBM quantum computer. “To the best of our knowledge, such particular quantum algorithm which can simulate how interacting quantum particles evolve over time has not been implemented before,” said Ghaemi, associate professor in CCNY’s Division of Science.

    Reply
  16. Tomi Engdahl says:

    https://hackaday.com/2022/08/07/hackaday-links-august-7-2022/

    If your personal edification shortlist includes understanding quantum programming, you could do worse than watching New Mind’s latest video on the subject. Where this one stands out for us is in the comparison of quantum concepts to what most of us already know about how digital computers work — how normal gates compare to quantum gates, for instance. We have to admit that the first watch-through didn’t entirely sink in — we’ll be giving it another go soon, hopefully before the next part is released.

    Quantum Programming – Part 1
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Eswqed8agg

    Reply
  17. Tomi Engdahl says:

    World’s Fastest 2-Qubit Gate: Breakthrough for the Realization of Ultrafast Quantum Computers
    https://scitechdaily.com/worlds-fastest-2-qubit-gate-breakthrough-for-the-realization-of-ultrafast-quantum-computers/

    Reply
  18. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Traditional Computers Can Beat Google’s Quantum Computer Thanks To Smart Algorithm Design
    The claim a quantum computer had finally achieved something traditional computers cannot has been challenged using superior algorithm design.
    https://www.iflscience.com/traditional-computers-can-beat-googles-quantum-computer-thanks-to-smart-algorithm-design-64748

    Reply
  19. Tomi Engdahl says:

    “Qudit” Computers Go Beyond Ones and Zeroes New machine works with eight qudits, each capable of encoding seven states at once
    https://spectrum.ieee.org/qudit?share_id=7159724

    Reply
  20. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Computer Science Proof Unveils Unexpected Form of Entanglement
    Three computer scientists have posted a proof of the NLTS conjecture, showing that systems of entangled particles can remain difficult to analyze even away from extremes.
    https://nautil.us/computer-science-proof-unveils-unexpected-form-of-entanglement-22240/

    Reply
  21. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Machine Learning Gets a Quantum Speedup
    By
    MAX G. LEVY
    February 4, 2022
    https://www.quantamagazine.org/ai-gets-a-quantum-computing-speedup-20220204/

    Two teams have shown how quantum approaches can solve problems faster than classical computers, bringing physics and computer science closer together.

    Reply
  22. Tomi Engdahl says:

    The entanglement of two quantum memory systems 12.5 km apart from each other
    https://phys.org/news/2022-08-entanglement-quantum-memory-km.html

    Reply
  23. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Quantum computer made of 6 super-sized atoms could imitate the brain
    https://www.newscientist.com/article/2333553-quantum-computer-made-of-6-super-sized-atoms-could-imitate-the-brain/

    Simulations of a quantum computer made of six rubidium atoms suggest it could run a simple brain-inspired algorithm that can learn to remember and make simple decisions

    Reply
  24. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Reuters:
    Baidu reveals its first quantum computer, Qianshi, which has a 10-qubit processor, and says it is developing a 36-qubit system

    https://www.reuters.com/technology/chinas-baidu-reveals-its-first-quantum-computer-called-qianshi-2022-08-25/

    Reply
  25. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Quantum annealing can beat classical computing in limited cases
    https://phys.org/news/2022-08-quantum-annealing-classical-limited-cases.html

    Recent research proves that under certain conditions, quantum annealing computers can run algorithms—including the well-known Shor’s algorithm—more quickly than classical computers. In most cases, however, quantum annealing does not provide a speed-up compared to classical computing when time is limited, according to a study in Nature Communications.

    “We proved that you can be sure you will reach a fast solution from the initial problem, but that’s only true for a certain class of problems that can be set up so that the many histories of evolution of the quantum system interfere constructively. Then the different quantum histories enhance each other’s probability to reach the solution,” said Nikolai Sinitsyn, a theoretical quantum physicist at Los Alamos National Laboratory and coauthor of the paper with his Los Alamos colleague Bin Yan.

    Reply
  26. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Google’s quantum supremacy challenged by ordinary computers, for now
    https://www.newscientist.com/article/2333837-googles-quantum-supremacy-challenged-by-ordinary-computers-for-now/

    In 2019, Google showed that its Sycamore quantum computer could solve a problem that no ordinary computer could handle – but now a new algorithm gives non-quantum devices the edge

    Reply
  27. Tomi Engdahl says:

    “In my opinion, quantum practicality is likely still 10 to 15 years away. However, progress toward that goal is not just steady; it’s accelerating.”

    Disentangling the Facts From the Hype of Quantum Computing IEEE Quantum Week is a chance to celebrate progress and acknowledge the challenges
    https://spectrum.ieee.org/ieee-quantum-week?share_id=7228601&socialux=facebook&utm_campaign=RebelMouse&utm_content=IEEE+Spectrum&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook#toggle-gdpr

    Few fields invite as much unbridled hype as quantum computing. Most people’s understanding of quantum physics extends to the fact that it is unpredictable, powerful, and almost existentially strange. A few years ago, I provided IEEE Spectrum an update on the state of quantum computing and looked at both the positive and negative claims across the industry. And just as back in 2019, I remain enthusiastically optimistic today. Even though the hype is real and has outpaced the actual results, much has been accomplished over the past few years.

    First, let’s address the hype.

    Over the past five years, there has been undeniable hype around quantum computing—hype around approaches, timelines, applications, and more. As far back as 2017, vendors were claiming the commercialization of the technology was just a couple of years away—like the announcement of a 5,000-qubit system by 2020 (which didn’t happen). There was even what I’d call antihype, with some questioning if quantum computers would materialize at all

    More recently, companies have shifted their timelines from a few years to a decade, but they continue to release road maps showing commercially viable systems as early as 2029.

    And these hype-fueled expectations are becoming institutionalized: The Department of Homeland Security even released a road map to protect against the threats of quantum computing, in an effort to help institutions transition to new security systems. This creates an “adopt or you’ll fall behind” mentality for both quantum-computing applications and postquantum cryptography security.

    Market research firm Gartner (of the “Hype Cycle” fame) believes quantum computing may have already reached peak hype, or phase two of its five-phase growth model. This means the industry is about to enter a phase called “the trough of disillusionment.” According to McKinsey & Company, “fault tolerant quantum computing is expected between 2025 and 2030 based on announced hardware roadmaps for gate-based quantum computing players.” I believe this is not entirely realistic, as we still have a long journey to achieve quantum practicality—the point at which quantum computers can do something unique to change our lives.

    In my opinion, quantum practicality is likely still 10 to 15 years away. However, progress toward that goal is not just steady; it’s accelerating. That’s the same thing we saw with Moore’s Law and semiconductor evolution: The more we discover, the faster we go. Semiconductor technology has taken decades to progress to its current state, accelerating at each turn. We expect similar advancement with quantum computing.

    Reply
  28. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Kvanttiväylä avaa tietä
    https://www.nanobitteja.fi/uutiset.html?216834

    Kvanttitietokoneiden käytännön toimiin tarvitaan miljoonia kvanttibittejä.

    Forschungszentrum Jülichin ja RWTH Aachenin yliopiston tutkijat ovat nyt tehneet merkittävän askeleen ongelman ratkaisemista.

    He onnistuivat siirtämään kvantti-informaation kantajina elektroneja kvanttisirulla useiden mikrometrien yli. Heidän kehittämänsä “kvanttiväylä” voisi olla avainkomponentti, joka suuntaa harppauksen miljooniin kubitteihin.

    “Tällä hetkellä jokainen yksittäinen kubitti on kytketty useiden signaalilinjojen kautta ohjausyksiköihin. Kvanttisirulla ei voi olla miljoonia tuloja ja lähtöjä – moderni klassinenkin siru sisältää vain noin 2000 I/O:ta.

    Kaksi spiniä tuottaa kvanttiväylän
    https://www.nanobitteja.fi/uutiset.html?212150

    Reply
  29. Tomi Engdahl says:

    A nanomaterial called a metasurface is poised to help simplify quantum information technologies but also enable complex applications.

    Entangled Photons Can Come Out in Webs Now
    https://spectrum.ieee.org/metasurface-entangled-photons?share_id=7248643&socialux=facebook&utm_campaign=RebelMouse&utm_content=IEEE+Spectrum&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook#toggle-gdpr

    Metasurfaces will help simplify quantum information technologies but also enable complex applications

    Reply
  30. Tomi Engdahl says:

    ‘Twisty’ photons could turbocharge next-gen quantum communication
    https://phys.org/news/2022-09-twisty-photons-turbocharge-next-gen-quantum.html

    A quantum emitter capable of emitting single photons integrated with a geared-shaped resonator. By fine-tuning the arrangement of the emitter and the gear-shaped resonator, it’s possible to leverage the interaction between the photon’s spin and its orbital angular momentum to create individual “twisty” photons on demand.

    Reply
  31. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Quantum-Safe Communications Startup Qunnect Raises $8 Million
    https://www.securityweek.com/quantum-safe-communications-startup-qunnect-raises-8-million

    Quantum-secure networking devices maker Qunnect this week announced raising $8 million in a Series A funding round that brings the total investment in the company to $12.4 million.

    The new investment round was led by Airbus Ventures, with additional participation from Impact Science Ventures, Motus Ventures, NY Ventures, Quantonation, and SandboxAQ.

    The New York-based company emerged in 2017 as a spin-off venture from the Quantum Information Technology group at Stony Brook university, focusing on the engineering of quantum-secure networking solutions that can be deployed on existing telecom infrastructure.

    Qunnect, which started selling the world’s first quantum memory last year, plans to deliver its first-generation product suite in 2023, to provide a commercial distributed entanglement network.

    Reply
  32. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Exploring the decay processes of a quantum state weakly coupled to a finite-size reservoir
    https://phys.org/news/2022-10-exploring-quantum-state-weakly-coupled.html

    Reply
  33. Tomi Engdahl says:

    SCIENTISTS FED THE #FIBONACCI_SEQUENCE INTO A QUANTUUM COMPUTER — In the experiment, a regular qubit at each end of a line-up of ten atoms retained its quantum state for 1.5 seconds. But when they blasted those atoms with a pulse of laser light to the tune of the Fibonacci numbers — a sequence of numbers where each number is the sum of the two preceding ones — the qubits lasted a whopping 5.5 seconds.

    SCIENTISTS FED THE FIBONACCI SEQUENCE INTO A QUANTUM COMPUTER AND SOMETHING STRANGE HAPPENED
    https://futurism.com/the-byte/fibonacci-quantum-computer

    “YOU CAN HAVE THE SYSTEM BEHAVE AS IF THERE ARE TWO DISTINCT DIRECTIONS OF TIME.”

    Future of Computing
    Physicists shot a laser pulse sequence mimicking the Fibonacci sequence at a quantum computer and ended up creating a new phase of matter in the process, according to a study published in Nature earlier this year.

    They suggest that the newfound phase of matter is particularly robust in preserving information, more so than the methods currently used.

    In the experiment, a regular qubit at each end of a line-up of ten atoms retained its quantum state for 1.5 seconds. But when they blasted those atoms with a pulse of laser light to the tune of the Fibonacci numbers — a sequence of numbers where each number is the sum of the two preceding ones — the qubits lasted a whopping 5.5 seconds.

    And according to the physicists, the reason that occurs has to do with time itself.

    “What we realized is that by using quasi-periodic sequences based on the Fibonacci pattern, you can have the system behave as if there are two distinct directions of time,” study lead author Philip Dumistrescu, a research fellow at the Flatiron Institute’s Center for Computational Quantum Physics, told Gizmodo in a recent interview.

    Erasing Errors
    But why the Fibonacci numbers? In essence, when you shoot laser pulses following the Fibonacci numbers, they act as a sort of quasicrystal, the physicists say, a structure of matter that adheres to a pattern, but is not periodic.

    In other words, ordered, but not repeating.

    “With this quasi-periodic sequence, there’s a complicated evolution that cancels out all the errors that live on the edge,” Dumistrescu elaborated in a press release. “Because of that, the edge stays quantum-mechanically coherent much, much longer than you’d expect.”

    Reply
  34. Tomi Engdahl says:

    The Quantum Hype Bubble Is About To Burst
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CBLVtCYHVO8

    How much of what you hear about quantum computing is real promise and how much of it is hype? What is the “quantum winter” that so many physicists have been warning of? In this video I sort it out for you.

    The Physics World article about quantum hype (which is a great read) is here:
    https://physicsworld.com/a/the-quantum-hype-cycle-revisited/

    Reply
  35. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Frederic Lardinois / TechCrunch:
    IBM unveils its Osprey quantum processor with 433 qubits, up from 127 in its 2021 Eagle processor, and plans to hit 4,000+ with its Kookaburra processor in 2025

    IBM unveils its 433 qubit Osprey quantum computer
    Frederic Lardinois@fredericl / 4:00 PM GMT+2•November 9, 2022
    https://techcrunch.com/2022/11/09/ibm-unveils-its-433-qubit-osprey-quantum-computer/

    IBM wants to scale up its quantum computers to over 4,000 qubits by 2025 — but we’re not quite there yet. For now, we have to make do with significantly smaller systems and today, IBM announced the launch of its Osprey quantum processor, which features 433 qubits, up from the 127 qubits of its 2021 Eagle processor. And with that, the slow but steady march toward a quantum processor with real-world applications continues.

    “The new 433 qubit ‘Osprey’ processor brings us a step closer to the point where quantum computers will be used to tackle previously unsolvable problems,” said Darío Gil, senior vice president, IBM and director of Research. “We are continuously scaling up and advancing our quantum technology across hardware, software and classical integration to meet the biggest challenges of our time, in conjunction with our partners and clients worldwide. This work will prove foundational for the coming era of quantum-centric supercomputing.”

    Reply
  36. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Suomessa kehitetty uusi kubitti voi tehdä kvanttikoneista tarkempia
    https://etn.fi/index.php/13-news/14262-suomessa-kehitetty-uusi-kubitti-voi-tehdae-kvanttikoneista-tarkempia

    IQM:n, Aalto-yliopiston ja VTT:n tutkijat ovat keksineet uuden suprajohtavan kubitin, joka saattaa lisätä kvanttilaskennan tarkkuutta. Unimon-kubiteilla saavutettiin ensimmäiset loogiset kvanttiportit 99,9 prosentin tarkkuudella, mikä on tärkeä virstanpylväs kaupallisesti hyödyllisten kvanttitietokoneiden rakentamisessa. Tutkimus julkaistiin juuri Nature Communications -lehdessä.

    Reply
  37. Tomi Engdahl says:

    A new fundamental operation dramatically reduces the overhead for quantum computing applications—AND it looks to simplify quantum coding whether in a nearby machine or on the cloud.

    Quantum Researchers Discover the AND Gate New
    https://spectrum.ieee.org/quantum-and-gate?share_id=7329871&socialux=facebook&utm_campaign=RebelMouse&utm_content=IEEE+Spectrum&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook

    fundamental operation could dramatically reduce overhead for quantum computing applications

    Reply
  38. Tomi Engdahl says:

    Quantum Computing and Security
    Quantum computing requires new hardware technology but it offers significant performance improvements for many computational problems.
    https://www.electronicdesign.com/magazine/51352

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*